Whitaker v. Record

25 Tex. 382
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, C. J.

—The petition is manifestly insufficient to support a recovery. It contains no averment of any breach of contract on the part of the defendants. It is not enough that the plaintiff is the holder of a note which the defendants are liable to pay; it must appear by averment that they have violated their contract, by refusing to make payment of the note agreeably to their undertaking,' in order that the petition may show a cause of action. It is essential, to constitute the statement of a cause of action, that it appear, by averment, not only that the plaintiff has a right, but that the defendant has done or omitted some act or duty in derogation of that right.

Moreover, there is no sufficient service upon any of-the defendants.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitaker v. Record, 25 Tex. 382 (Tex. 1860).

25 Tex. 382 (Whitaker v. Record) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beck v. Nelson
17 S.W.2d 144 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Johnson v. Wise
272 S.W. 296 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Davis v. White
207 S.W. 679 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Merriman v. Swift & Co.
204 S.W. 775 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
McWhorter v. Estes
175 S.W. 846 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)