Whitaker v. Pizza Hut

502 So. 2d 84, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1258·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying Annette Whitaker unemployment benefits because of alleged misconduct as defined in section 443.036(24), Florida Statutes (1985). Gold-stein v. Ury Kalai M.D., P.A., 480 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Our review of the record satisfies us that Whitaker’s action of failing to follow the proper procedure for testing pizza dough was poor judgment not an intentional disregard of her employer’s interests as required by section 443.036(24).

This matter is reversed and remanded for reinstatement of Whitaker’s unemployment benefits.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitaker v. Pizza Hut, 502 So. 2d 84, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 84 (Whitaker v. Pizza Hut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. Rice
693 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Signal Applied Technologies, Inc. v. Finley
519 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)