Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whitaker v. Pizza Hut

Whitaker v. Pizza Hut

502 So. 2d 84, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-1258
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 84 (Whitaker v. Pizza Hut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitaker v. Pizza Hut, 502 So. 2d 84, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying Annette Whitaker unemployment benefits because of alleged misconduct as defined in section 443.036(24), Florida Statutes (1985). Gold-stein v. Ury Kalai M.D., P.A., 480 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Our review of the record satisfies us that Whitaker’s action of failing to follow the proper procedure for testing pizza dough was poor judgment not an intentional disregard of her employer’s interests as required by section 443.036(24).

This matter is reversed and remanded for reinstatement of Whitaker’s unemployment benefits.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Rice
693 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Signal Applied Technologies, Inc. v. Finley
519 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 So. 2d 84, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-pizza-hut-fladistctapp-1987.