Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

Fourth Circuit

Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

562 F. App'x 180

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2014·No. No. 13-2352·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on his claim of retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:12-cv-00623-BO, 2013 WL 5592881 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on his claim of retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:12-cv-00623-BO, 2013 WL 5592881 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education, 562 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

562 F. App'x 180 (Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.