Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education
This text of 562 F. App'x 180 (Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on his claim of retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:12-cv-00623-BO, 2013 WL 5592881 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-nash-rocky-mount-board-of-education-ca4-2014.