Whitaker v. Infinite Loop Cupertino Hotel, LLC

District Court, N.D. California·Decided September 8, 2021·No. 5:21-cv-00483·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-00483-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 9 v. DISMISSAL 10 INFINITE LOOP CUPERTINO HOTEL, LLC, 11 Defendant. a 12

13 On August 23, 2021, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend

v 14 || and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than 14 days from that order. See ECF

15 || No. 21. The Court warned that “failure to meet the deadline to file an amended complaint □ □ . will A 16 || result in dismissal of Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.” Jd. at 9. Plaintiff did not file an amended

= 17 || complaint by 14 days from that order. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, Z 18 || in writing, on or before September 22, 2021, why this action should not be dismissed for failure 19 || to comply with this Court’s order and for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not respond by 20 || September 22, 2021, the Court will dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 41(b) without further notice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest 22 || Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: September 8, 2021 han tn) Ly NM. BETH LABSON FREEMAN 27 United States District Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitaker v. Infinite Loop Cupertino Hotel, LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Whitaker v. Infinite Loop Cupertino Hotel, LLC (Whitaker v. Infinite Loop Cupertino Hotel, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related