Whitaker v. Hartford, Providence and Fishkill Railroad Co.

8 R.I. 47
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 6, 1864
StatusPublished

This text of 8 R.I. 47 (Whitaker v. Hartford, Providence and Fishkill Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitaker v. Hartford, Providence and Fishkill Railroad Co., 8 R.I. 47 (R.I. 1864).

Opinion

Ames, C. J.

The suit is for the amount of the interest coupons only, the bonds not being due. These, neither by their terms, nor by custom, are payable with interest, but are to be presented for, and given up on, payment. Until presented, the defendants could have been in no default for non-payment; but after it, the coupons being due, the refusal to pay was a clear breach of the contract, and interest from the time of demand and refusal is recoverable by way of damages, Railroad bonds, *50 with interest coupons attached, are purchased for investment and income, and when the latter is not paid at the time promised, no well considered authority, properly understood, forbids what principle requires, that the damage from delay of payment should be compensated by interest on the amount due, computed from the day of demand and refusal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 R.I. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-hartford-providence-and-fishkill-railroad-co-ri-1864.