Whitaker v. Fitch

25 Tex. 308
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Tex. 308 (Whitaker v. Fitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitaker v. Fitch, 25 Tex. 308 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Kell, J.

—The service of the original citation in this cause reads as follows: “Gameto hand August 27,1859, and executed by delivering to the within named' defendant, Samuel Whitaker, a true copy of citation, and a certified copy of plaintiff’s petition.” This was signed officially by the sheriff.

There was judgment for the plaintiff by default.

It is alleged as error, that the return on the citation does not show when the service was made. We are of opinion that the service was not sufficient to authorize the judgment, and for the reason indicated. The statute requires that “ the sheriff shall indorse on all process and precepts coming to his hands the day on which he received them, the manner in which he executed them, and the day when he executed them,” &c. To authorize a judgment by default, the return on the citation should show a compliance with the statute, and one of the plain requirements of the statute is, that the return shall show the day when the writ was served.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause

■Kemanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-fitch-tex-1860.