Whitaker v. Dunbar

Fourth Circuit

Whitaker v. Dunbar

591 F. App'x 218

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2015·No. No. 14-7322·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lance Whitaker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district court’s order. We also deny Whitaker’s motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lance Whitaker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district court’s order. We also deny Whitaker’s motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Whitaker v. Dunbar, 591 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

591 F. App'x 218 (Whitaker v. Dunbar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related