Whist Club v. Foster

42 F.2d 782, 3 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 88, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1119
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 21, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THACHER, District Judge.

In the conventional laws or rules of a game, as distinguished from the forms or modes of expression in which they may be stated, there can be no literary property susceptible of copyright. Defendant has not infringed, because he has not copied the literary composition of the plaintiff’s publication, but, in language quite distinctly his own, has restated the same set of conventional precepts. This under all the authorities he was entitled to do, and neither the general acceptance of the rules as official, nor, if it were true, their rejection as officious, could have any bearing on this controversy.

Bill dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whist Club v. Foster, 42 F.2d 782, 3 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 88, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1119 (S.D.N.Y. 1929).

42 F.2d 782 (Whist Club v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Bally Manufacturing Corp.
568 F. Supp. 1274 (N.D. Illinois, 1983)
Lewis v. Kroger Co.
109 F. Supp. 484 (S.D. West Virginia, 1952)
Chamberlin v. Uris Sales Corporation
150 F.2d 512 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Chamberlin v. Uris Sales Corporation
56 F. Supp. 987 (S.D. New York, 1944)
Borden v. General Motors Corporation
28 F. Supp. 330 (S.D. New York, 1939)