Whiskey-A-Go-Go, Inc. v. Dynasty Room, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Whiskey-A-Go-Go, Inc. v. Dynasty Room, Inc.

186 So. 2d 404, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4692

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 2, 1966

DocketNo. 2229

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 404 (Whiskey-A-Go-Go, Inc. v. Dynasty Room, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whiskey-A-Go-Go, Inc. v. Dynasty Room, Inc., 186 So. 2d 404, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4692 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

McBRIDE, Judge.

This case was consolidated with Dynasty Room, Inc., v. Whiskey-A-Go-Go, Incor[405]*405porated, La.App., 186 So.2d 402, an opinion .and decree in which was handed down this day.

The corporation known as Whiskey-AGo-Go, Incorporated, sought to enjoin Dynasty Room, Inc., and its president from using the trade name Whiskey-A-Go-Go, on the contention that plaintiff has the exclusive right to use said trade name by virtue of the appearance of the same in its corporate title. The trial judge after a hearing on the rule nisi denied a preliminary injunction and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.

The issues in the instant case are the same as those involved in the above mentioned matter and, for the reasons stated in our opinion and decree therein, the trial court must be affirmed.

It is so ordered and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with law; appellant is to bear the costs of this appeal while the liability for all other costs must await a final determination of the matter.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI