Whisenhunt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Whisenhunt v. State

1930 OK CR 465, 292 P. 1119, 49 Okla. Crim. 49, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1930

DocketNo. A-7685.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 465 (Whisenhunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whisenhunt v. State, 1930 OK CR 465, 292 P. 1119, 49 Okla. Crim. 49, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of a still, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The case was tried in October, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in December, 1929.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

We have examined the. record and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of a still, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The case was tried in October, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in December, 1929.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

We have examined the. record and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 465, 292 P. 1119, 49 Okla. Crim. 49, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whisenhunt-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.