Whisenant v. State
187 So. 255, 28 Ala. App. 469, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 116
Opinion
The defendant was indicted and convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and from the judgment he appeals.
We have examined the record in this case. There is no bill qí exceptions.
We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whisenant v. State, 187 So. 255, 28 Ala. App. 469, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 116 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).
187 So. 255 (Whisenant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.