Whisenant v. State

187 So. 255, 28 Ala. App. 469, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 116
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 7, 1939
Docket8 Div. 744.
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 255 (Whisenant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whisenant v. State, 187 So. 255, 28 Ala. App. 469, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 116 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted and convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and from the judgment he appeals.

We have examined the record in this case. There is no bill qí exceptions.

We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 255, 28 Ala. App. 469, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whisenant-v-state-alactapp-1939.