Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer

569 U.S. 901, 185 L. Ed. 2d 782, 133 S. Ct. 1722, 81 U.S.L.W. 3554, 2013 WL 1285305, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 2695
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 2013·No. No. 12–322.·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, ---U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1426, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer, 569 U.S. 901, 185 L. Ed. 2d 782, 133 S. Ct. 1722, 81 U.S.L.W. 3554, 2013 WL 1285305, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 2695 (2013).

569 U.S. 901 (Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
135 F. Supp. 3d 679 (N.D. Ohio, 2015)
Dockery v. Fischer
253 F. Supp. 3d 832 (S.D. Mississippi, 2015)
Leonard v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 F. Supp. 3d 934 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
Lisk v. Lumber One Wood Preserving, LLC
993 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (N.D. Alabama, 2014)
In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
297 F.R.D. 168 (D. Massachusetts, 2013)
M.D. v. Perry
294 F.R.D. 7 (S.D. Texas, 2013)
Huffman v. Electrolux North America, Inc.
961 F. Supp. 2d 875 (N.D. Ohio, 2013)
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.
293 F.R.D. 578 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool Corporation
722 F.3d 838 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)