Whipple v. State

161 S.E. 276, 44 Ga. App. 300, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 686
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1931
Docket21804
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 276 (Whipple v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whipple v. State, 161 S.E. 276, 44 Ga. App. 300, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 686 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, are treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. State
121 S.E.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 276, 44 Ga. App. 300, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whipple-v-state-gactapp-1931.