Whipple v. State
161 S.E. 276, 44 Ga. App. 300, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 686
Opinion
1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, are treated as abandoned.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whipple v. State, 161 S.E. 276, 44 Ga. App. 300, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 686 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).
161 S.E. 276 (Whipple v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
121 S.E.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)