Whipple v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Whipple v. Auditor General

1 McGrath 1035, 5 McGrath 193

DecidedMay 28, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1035 (Whipple v. Auditor General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whipple v. Auditor General, 1 McGrath 1035, 5 McGrath 193 (Mich. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel payment of the salary of relator’s intestate, as judge of the Supreme Court, he having been elected circuit judge, and under the Act of 1851 acted as judge of the Supreme Court.

Denied May 28, 1858, on the ground that under the Constitution of 1850, the office of judge of the Supreme Court, [1038]*1038was not a distinct office from that of circuit judge, but two sets of duties were attached to the office of circuit judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel payment of the salary of relator’s intestate, as judge of the Supreme Court, he having been elected circuit judge, and under the Act of 1851 acted as judge of the Supreme Court.

Denied May 28, 1858, on the ground that under the Constitution of 1850, the office of judge of the Supreme Court, [1038]*1038was not a distinct office from that of circuit judge, but two sets of duties were attached to the office of circuit judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1035, 5 McGrath 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whipple-v-auditor-general-mich-1858.