Whipley v. Dewey

17 Cal. 314
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cal. 314 (Whipley v. Dewey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whipley v. Dewey, 17 Cal. 314 (Cal. 1861).

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

When this case was called for trial, the plaintiff moved for a continuance, which was refused, and he thereupon took a voluntary nonsuit, with leave to move to set the same aside upon affidavits. Two days afterwards he gave notice of his intention to make the , motion as soon as the affidavits for that purpose could be procured. This notice was given on the fifth of January, 1860, and the term expired on the last day of that month, without any additional steps being taken. The order permitting the plaintiff to move to set aside the nonsuit preserved all his rights in the proceedings, but in legal effect it amounted to nothing more than a permission to move for a new trial, and it was necessary that the provisions of the statute in relation to new trials should be complied with. This was not done, and upon the expiration of the term, the Court lost all jurisdiction of the matter.

The order setting aside the nonsuit and granting a new trial is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Cal. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whipley-v-dewey-cal-1861.