Whipkey v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.

116 Ohio St. 3d 224
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whipkey v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 3d 1440
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 2007·No. No. 2006-1972·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Special Docket No. 73958, 115 Ohio St.3d 425, 2007-Ohio-5268, 875 N.E.2d 596, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of appellants’ assignments of error.

Brent Coon & Associates, Mary Brigid Sweeney, and Christopher J. Hickey, for appellees. Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Susan S. Box, Brad A. Rimmel, and Nathan F. Studeny, for appellant General Motors Corporation. Sutter, O’Connell & Farchione Co., L.P.A., Matthew C. O’Connell, Victoria D. Barto, and Douglas R. Simek, for appellant Garlock Sealing Technologies, L.L.C. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whipkey v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., 116 Ohio St. 3d 224 (Ohio 2007).

116 Ohio St. 3d 224 (Whipkey v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Special Docket No. 73958
115 Ohio St. 3d 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)