Whilldin v. Krantz

103 So. 193, 89 Fla. 33
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 So. 193 (Whilldin v. Krantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whilldin v. Krantz, 103 So. 193, 89 Fla. 33 (Fla. 1925).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order denying a motion and petition for a rehearing on a final decree upon a bill of review.

The bill of review does not set out all of the record upon which it is predicated, viz, it does not state a demurrer that was overruled, or the answer of a defendant who was dismissed from the suit or the decree pro confesso entered against another defendant ivho is the complainant below herein, or the-order dismissing one defendant from the suit and continuing the suit as to another defendant, complainant here. See 3 Ency. Pl. & Pr., 574 et seq.; 21 C. J. 740 et seq.

The bill of review does not state that the final decree sought to be set aside has been performed.

No error apparent is shown by the bill of review, and no new matter is set up that in equity entitles the complainant to the relief sought.

*34 The bill of review should have been dismissed. See Whilldin v. Green, this day filed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Fielding
4 So. 2d 678 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 So. 193, 89 Fla. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whilldin-v-krantz-fla-1925.