Whigham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whigham v. State

99 So. 662, 19 Ala. App. 595, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 59

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 1924

Docket4 Div. 874.

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 662 (Whigham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whigham v. State, 99 So. 662, 19 Ala. App. 595, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 59 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted of grand larceny. On April 19, 1923, sentence was pronounced by the court upon the defendant. An appeal was immediately taken to this court, and defendant executed an appeal bond. After appeal was taken a motion for new trial was made. After an appeal was taken by the defendant jurisdiction was transferred from the circuit court to this court, and the trial court was without authority to entertain the motion for a new trial. Sherman v. State, 15 Ala. App. 175, 72 South. 755; State ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Brewer, ante, p. 330, 97 South. 777.

*596 There is no bill of exceptions. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted of grand larceny. On April 19, 1923, sentence was pronounced by the court upon the defendant. An appeal was immediately taken to this court, and defendant executed an appeal bond. After appeal was taken a motion for new trial was made. After an appeal was taken by the defendant jurisdiction was transferred from the circuit court to this court, and the trial court was without authority to entertain the motion for a new trial. Sherman v. State, 15 Ala. App. 175, 72 South. 755; State ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Brewer, ante, p. 330, 97 South. 777.

*596 There is no bill of exceptions. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 662, 19 Ala. App. 595, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whigham-v-state-alactapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack