Whidby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Whidby v. State

94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 146, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 480

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 31, 1917

Docket9070

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 61 (Whidby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whidby v. State, 94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 146, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “A motion for a mistrial was not the appropriate remedy when, upon a x>oll of the jury, the party against whom the verdict was rendered contended that it appeared from the answers of one of the jurors that it was not his verdict.” Macon Railway &c. Co. v. Barnes, 121 Ca. 444 (49 S. E. 282).

2. The court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI