Whidby v. State
94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 146, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 480
Opinion
1. “A motion for a mistrial was not the appropriate remedy when, upon a x>oll of the jury, the party against whom the verdict was rendered contended that it appeared from the answers of one of the jurors that it was not his verdict.” Macon Railway &c. Co. v. Barnes, 121 Ca. 444 (49 S. E. 282).
2. The court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whidby v. State, 94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 146, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
94 S.E. 61 (Whidby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Macon Railway & Light Co. v. Barnes
49 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)