Whicker v. . Crews

36 N.C. 351
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.C. 351 (Whicker v. . Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whicker v. . Crews, 36 N.C. 351 (N.C. 1841).

Opinion

*352 Gaston, J.

The object of this bill is to rescind a contract for the purchase of a tract of land in Stokes County, because of misrepresentations respecting its location and boundaries, made by the vendor, the defendant, in the course of the negotiation; whereby the plaintiff, as he alleges, was grossly deceived and grievously injured. The defendant positively denies the misrepresentations charged; and upon the proofs, the plaintiff has utterly failed to establish them. It is needless to go through these minutely. It is enough to say, that it appears that the negotiation was pending for many months — that in the course of it, the plaintiff had abundant opportunities of informing himself accurately respecting all the localities of the land — and that its boundaries were truly pointed out to him by persons, to whom the defendant had referred him for particular information, before the contract was brought to a conclusion.

The bill must be dismissed with costs.

Per Curiam, Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.C. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whicker-v-crews-nc-1841.