Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whetstone v. State

Whetstone v. State

415 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20167
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 1982
DocketNos. ZZ 469, AB-29
StatusPublished

This text of 415 So. 2d 777 (Whetstone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whetstone v. State, 415 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for lack of an appropriate record. Salomon v. State, 385 So.2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). On the State’s appeal, the sentence is vacated and the case remanded for imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence required by section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1981), and State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981), which was decided after the sentencing in this case. Whetstone need not be present at resentencing.

[778]*778AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge, and ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Benitez
395 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Salomon v. State
385 So. 2d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whetstone-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.