Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.

289 F.2d 494, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 1961
DocketNo. 14365
StatusPublished

This text of 289 F.2d 494 (Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 289 F.2d 494, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721 (6th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

ORDER.

" We find no error in the order of the District Court striking the complaints from the files for noncompliance with Rules. 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Under all the circumstances of the case, we feel that the cause should not ■have been dismissed with prejudice and ¡that appellant should have been granted leave to file a second amended complaint complying with said rules.

• It is therefore ordered that the judg- • mént of - the Dis'triót Court dismissing the cause be vacated and the cause remanded with instructions to grant appellant leave to file her second amended complaint, complying with said rules, within 30 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F.2d 494, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whetstone-v-michigan-consolidated-gas-co-ca6-1961.