Wherein The Board'S Discretion Is Not So Broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep'T Of

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided December 11, 1996·No. 01A01-9607-CH-00335·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

RICKY HEMBREE, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-2874-I VS. ) ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9607-CH-00335 CHARLES TRAUGHBER, ) CHAIRMAN, TENNESSEE ) BOARD OF PAROLES,

Defendant/Appellee. ) ) ) FILED December 11, 1996

Cecil W. Crowson CONCURRING OPINION Appellate Court Clerk

I concur that the Board of Paroles had the discretion to grant or deny Mr. Hembree parole under the facts of this case. However, circumstances may arise wherein the board’s discretion is not so broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep’t of Correction, App. No. 01A01-9504-CV-00013, 1995 WL 700205 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 1995).

____________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wherein The Board'S Discretion Is Not So Broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep'T Of, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Wherein The Board'S Discretion Is Not So Broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep'T Of (Wherein The Board'S Discretion Is Not So Broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep'T Of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.