Whelton v. Tompson
121 Mass. 346, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 378
This text of 121 Mass. 346 (Whelton v. Tompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whelton v. Tompson, 121 Mass. 346, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 378 (Mass. 1876).
Opinion
The ruling requested should have been given. As stated in the bill of exceptions, it did not relate to the proof of a breach, but to the proof of the terms of the contract declared on. If one of the terms alleged was not proved, there was a variance, and the plaintiffs could not recover undei iheir declaration. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Capitol Beef & Provision Co. v. Somerville Dressed Meat Co.
301 N.E.2d 825 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
United Neon Sign Corp. v. Zahos
189 N.E. 830 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Fried v. Singer
136 N.E. 609 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 Mass. 346, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whelton-v-tompson-mass-1876.