Whelchel v. Hall County

133 S.E. 865, 162 Ga. 394, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 200
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 1926
DocketNo. 5063
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 865 (Whelchel v. Hall County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whelchel v. Hall County, 133 S.E. 865, 162 Ga. 394, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 200 (Ga. 1926).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Tlie court did not err in refusing an injunction. The petitioner failed to show title in her intestate. She introduced a deed from a third party, but there was no attempt to derive title from the State nor from any one shown to have been in possession, and it is not shown that plaintiff or her intestate had been in possession of this land. The mere statement of a witness that he was the agent of the plaintiff and had been looking after the property in question did not supply proof of possession. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. 0. Adams and Charters & Wheeler, for plaintiff. Edgar B. Dunlap, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 865, 162 Ga. 394, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whelchel-v-hall-county-ga-1926.