Wheelock v. TRILITE STONE

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Wheelock v. TRILITE STONE

710 N.W.2d 264, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 97, 2006 WL 490172

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 23, 2006·No. A05-1697·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 1, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 1, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Wheelock v. TRILITE STONE, 710 N.W.2d 264, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 97, 2006 WL 490172 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

710 N.W.2d 264 (Wheelock v. TRILITE STONE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related