Wheelock v. Brown
This text of 77 P. 1131 (Wheelock v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to recover commission for selling real estate. The oause was tried by the court and jury, and their verdict and.judgment were for plaintiff. The errors assigned and argued by the plaintiff in error are that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence, and misconduct of the attorney for plaintiff in arguing the case to the jury. The record' discloses that there wás sufficient competent evidence introduced by the plaintiff to justify the court’s overruling the demurrer. There was no misconduct on the part of counsel, which is discoverable from the record.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 P. 1131, 69 Kan. 848, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheelock-v-brown-kan-1894.