Wheelock, Scott Ralph

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2021
DocketWR-46,468-04
StatusPublished

This text of Wheelock, Scott Ralph (Wheelock, Scott Ralph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheelock, Scott Ralph, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-46,468-04

EX PARTE SCOTT RALPH WHEELOCK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. B18291 IN THE 198TH DISTRICT COURT FROM KERR COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to sixty years’

imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Wheelock v. State, 04-19-

00466-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 23, 2020)(not designated for publication). Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel

was deficient. He alleges that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to secure a twenty-five year

plea deal that his first attorney negotiated and he accepted, failing to challenge a warrantless blood

draw, failing to file a motion to suppress, and failing to challenge the enhancements. Applicant has 2

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte

Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,

the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .

CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 20, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex parte Argent
393 S.W.3d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wheelock, Scott Ralph, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheelock-scott-ralph-texcrimapp-2021.