Wheeless v. Rowan

90 S.E. 1035, 19 Ga. App. 70, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 45
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 11, 1916
Docket7471
StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 1035 (Wheeless v. Rowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeless v. Rowan, 90 S.E. 1035, 19 Ga. App. 70, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The pleadings were sufficient to authorize the recovery of attorney’s fees.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

3. An error of computation in the amount of the judgment rendered is plainly apparent, and, exercising the right vested in this court to give such order and direction in a cause as is consistent with the law and justice appertaining thereto, we affirm the judgment upon condition that the plaintiff write off from the judgment $29.65 as to the interest and $8.76 as to attorney’s fees.

■Judgment affirmed on condition.

Hodges, J., absent. Complaint; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. April 10, 1916. William Story, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 1035, 19 Ga. App. 70, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeless-v-rowan-gactapp-1916.