Wheeless v. . Barrett

49 S.E.2d 629, 229 N.C. 282
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 49 S.E.2d 629 (Wheeless v. . Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeless v. . Barrett, 49 S.E.2d 629, 229 N.C. 282 (N.C. 1948).

Opinion

Civil action to recover land allegedly wrongfully withheld by defendants, and for an accounting for rents, etc. *Page 283

When the case came on for hearing in the Superior Court, and after the pleadings were read, plaintiffs moved the court "for judgment of ownership and possession of the premises described in the amended complaint, upon the admissions contained in defendants' answer to amended complaint," and tendered an issue of damages as the only issue of fact raised by the pleadings, and to be submitted to the jury. The court, being of opinion that defendants' pleadings constitute an admission: (1) of ownership by the plaintiffs; and (2) that defendants are in possession wrongfully; and that, therefore, plaintiffs are entitled to recover possession; and that the issue of damages is the only issue of fact left in the case to be submitted to the jury, allowed the motion. In this connection the amended complaint alleges: In paragraph One: That plaintiffs, naming them, other than S.E. Sykes, with defendant, Mrs. O. W. Barrett, on 24 May, 1940, were "the officers and trustees of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, which was and is an unincorporated non-denominational religious and social service organization formed for the purpose of promoting fraternal intercourse, religious training and education, Christian unity, and spreading the Gospel, all to the glory of God and for the benefit of mankind for charitable and benevolent purposes including the accumulation of funds for the relief of the sick and needy; to provide for the visitation of the sick and such other worthy purposes and objects as affect the members of the City Mission and the people of the communities in which it has offices; to cultivate social intercourse among its members and other persons, and assist in maintaining a high standard of moral and social conditions in the community; for the purposes above specified, to receive donations and to receive, manage, take and hold real and personal property by gift, grant, devise or bequest; to do any and all things intended and calculated to improve the social, physical, intellectual, spiritual and moral condition and standing of persons living, residing and staying, permanently or temporarily, in the city of Rocky Mount."

Defendants, answering the foregoing allegations of the complaint, admit (1) that the persons named therein were on or about the 24th day of May, 1940, designated by the members of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, which was an unincorporated religious organization, and (2) that the purpose of said organization was and is as substantially set forth in said paragraph.

Plaintiffs further allege in paragraphs 2 and 3:

That on 24 May, 1940, J. M. Gregory and wife, in consideration of $8,000 paid or secured to be paid, conveyed to "the officers and trustees of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, a certain lot of land specifically described and a three-story brick business building in the business district of the city of Rocky Mount; and on same date *Page 284 plaintiffs, other than S.E. Sykes, together with defendant Mrs. O. W. Barrett, as officers and trustees of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, executed and delivered (a) to J. M. Gregory a note of said City Mission for the sum of $6,000.00, balance due on purchase price of said land and building, and (b) a certain deed of trust to D.C. May, Trustee, conveying said land as security for the payment of said note, which deed of trust was registered as set forth.

Defendants, answering the paragraphs containing these allegations, say that they are not denied.

Plaintiffs further allege in paragraph 4: That on 24 March, 1942, the said plaintiffs, other than S.E. Sykes, with defendant Mrs. O. W. Barrett, in their capacity as officers and trustees of said City Mission, executed and delivered (c) to G. D. Wheeless nine promissory notes, aggregating the sum of $4,900.00 for money borrowed, and (d) a deed of trust to Elizabeth M. Wheeless, Trustee, conveying said land as security for the payment of said notes, — the money being used to pay the balance due on the Gregory note, above described, and to obtain cancellation of said deed of trust to D.C. May, Trustee, on 30 March, 1942; and that there is now a balance of $3,000 principal in addition to interest due on the notes so executed to G. D. Wheeless, secured as aforesaid.

Defendants, in answer to these allegations, admit the execution and delivery of the notes and deed of trust referred to in said paragraph and further allege that a large part of the indebtedness represented by said notes has been paid and there is now approximately $3,000 due on said indebtedness.

Plaintiffs further allege in paragraph 5: That on 25 June, 1945, a certificate of incorporation of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, Inc., was issued by the Secretary of State of North Carolina and recorded in office of Clerk of Superior Court of Edgecombe County; and that the corporation was formed by George D. Wheeless, K. E. Hawkins and Mrs. Katherine Barrett, — she being the same person as the defendant Mrs. O. W. Barrett, in pursuance of the expressed wishes of the members of the City Mission, and for the purposes, ipsissimis verbis, as set out in the first paragraph of the amended complaint, and has no capital stock, — "the general welfare of society and not individual profit being the object for which the corporation is created."

Defendants, answering, say that paragraph 5 does not contain a full, true and correct statement of the facts and that said paragraph is therefore denied. But in this connection the defendant Mrs. O. W. Barrett avers that a certificate of incorporation was issued as alleged in said paragraph and a tentative arrangement was thereby made for the operation of the said City Mission of Rocky Mount as a corporation, but that said charter was not accepted by the membership thereof or approved *Page 285 by a majority thereof, and that said certificate was not filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Edgecombe County until sometime during the year 1947, and that these defendants aver on information and belief that it was filed at the instance of the plaintiffs or some of them and "was not done by a majority of the members of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, now known and designated as Central Baptist Church."

Plaintiffs further allege in paragraph 6: That at a meeting of seven members of the City Mission on 7 January, 1946, the defendant Mrs. O. W. Barrett presented the said certificate of incorporation and a resolution directing the officers and trustees of the City Mission of Rocky Mount, an unincorporated association, to execute and deliver to the City Mission of Rocky Mount, N.C. Inc., a good and sufficient deed conveying to it in fee simple the property hereinabove described, subject to the lien of the Wheeless deed of trust hereinabove referred to, which resolution is recorded as having been unanimously adopted.

Defendants, answering, say that paragraph 6 does not contain a full, true and correct statement of the facts, and as alleged is, therefore, denied. And in this connection defendants reiterate the averments that a majority of the members of said City Mission of Rocky Mount did not accept or approve of the incorporation thereof and that the certificate of incorporation was not filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Edgecombe County until during the year 1947, and, that it was filed by the plaintiffs or some of them who were not acting pursuant to the direction of the majority of the congregation or members of said organization.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western North Carolina Conference v. . Tally
47 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Kerr v. . Hicks
70 S.E. 468 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Roshi's Appeal
69 Pa. 462 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
State ex rel. Kerr v. Hicks
154 N.C. 265 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 S.E.2d 629, 229 N.C. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeless-v-barrett-nc-1948.