Wheeler & Wilson M'f'g Co. v. Whitcomb

62 N.H. 411
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 N.H. 411 (Wheeler & Wilson M'f'g Co. v. Whitcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler & Wilson M'f'g Co. v. Whitcomb, 62 N.H. 411 (N.H. 1882).

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

When the action was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the power of the court to determine either the title or the value of the property in controversy terminated, and the subsequent acts of assessing the damages and ordering judgment therefor were consequently unauthorized and void. The plaintiffs’ ■exceptions must therefore be sustained, but in order to prevent unnecessary litigation, and in furtherance of the more speedy administration of justice, the case is ordered to be sent to Merri *413 mack county for trial. See Bartlett v. Lee, 60 N. H. 168. The defendant will take costs to the time of transfer.

Ordered accordingly.

Stanley J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitcher v. Union Grange Fair Ass'n
92 A. 735 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1914)
Tucker v. Lake
29 A. 406 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.H. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-wilson-mfg-co-v-whitcomb-nh-1882.