Wheeler v. Vimalert Co.

235 A.D. 643
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order enjoining defendant Vimalert Company, Ltd., from prosecuting libel actions brought in the United States District Court and from instituting any further or other suits, and order on reargument, in so far as it denies said defendant’s motion to vacate the injunction, modified so as to provide that said defendant be enjoined only from commencing any further or other actions in connection with said defendant’s claim or claims against the plaintiffs arising out of the contract of purchase by plaintiffs of motors; and as so modified the orders are affirmed, "without costs. The court was without power to enjoin the prosecution of libel suits already brought in the United States District Court. (Riggs v. Johnson County, 6 Wall. [73 U. S.] 166, 194-196; Moran v. Sturges, 154 U. S. 256, 258; Central National Bank v. Stevens, 169 id. 432, 464; Beardslee v. Ingraham, 183 N. Y. 411, 417.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Vimalert Co., 235 A.D. 643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 643 (Wheeler v. Vimalert Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Atomic Co. v. Felter
560 P.2d 541 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1977)
Ross v. Cuban Dominican Sugar Corp.
236 A.D. 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)