Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company

D. Nevada

Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company

DecidedMarch 19, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-00642

StatusUnknown

This text of Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Antonio Wheeler, 4 2:24-cv-00642-CDS-MDC Plaintiffs, 5 vs. ORDER STRIKING ROGUE FILINGS (ECF NOS. 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13) 6 The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, et al.,

7 Defendants. 8 This case is closed. The Court entered judgment and dismissed this case without prejudice. ECF 9 Nos. 7 and 8. The plaintiff has since filed five new motions in this closed case. ECF Nos. 9-13. Because 10 this case is closed, the Court cannot act on plaintiff’s filings and thus, the Court strikes them from the 11 12 record. Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th Cir. 1995) (the district court has inherent authority to 13 strike improper filings “to promulgate and enforce rules for the management of litigation”). 14 IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 15 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time Frame (ECF No. 9), a Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File 16 Electronically (ECF No. 10), Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 11), 17 Motion to Provide Fee Copies (ECF No. 12), and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma 18 Pauperis (ECF No. 13) are all STRICKEN. 19 2. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that this matter is closed, and he may not file any documents in this 20 case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: March 19, 2025. 23 24 _________________________ Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier III 25 United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Antonio Wheeler, 4 2:24-cv-00642-CDS-MDC Plaintiffs, 5 vs. ORDER STRIKING ROGUE FILINGS (ECF NOS. 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13) 6 The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, et al.,

7 Defendants. 8 This case is closed. The Court entered judgment and dismissed this case without prejudice. ECF 9 Nos. 7 and 8. The plaintiff has since filed five new motions in this closed case. ECF Nos. 9-13. Because 10 this case is closed, the Court cannot act on plaintiff’s filings and thus, the Court strikes them from the 11 12 record. Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th Cir. 1995) (the district court has inherent authority to 13 strike improper filings “to promulgate and enforce rules for the management of litigation”). 14 IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 15 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time Frame (ECF No. 9), a Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File 16 Electronically (ECF No. 10), Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 11), 17 Motion to Provide Fee Copies (ECF No. 12), and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma 18 Pauperis (ECF No. 13) are all STRICKEN. 19 2. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that this matter is closed, and he may not file any documents in this 20 case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: March 19, 2025. 23 24 _________________________ Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier III 25 United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wheeler v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-the-whiting-turner-contracting-company-nvd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack