Wheeler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wheeler v. State

1911 OK CR 508, 118 P. 1118, 6 Okla. Crim. 685, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 520

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 24, 1911

DocketNo. A-807.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 508 (Wheeler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. State, 1911 OK CR 508, 118 P. 1118, 6 Okla. Crim. 685, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 520 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in e^ror, Frank Wheeler, was convicted in the county court of Murray county at the March, 1910, term, on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful purpose of selling the same, and was thereafter sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of six months. The only proof in this record upon which the conviction is based is that the defendant had possession of certain intoxicating liquor. Following the rule laid down in the case of Brooks Andrews v. State, infra, decided at this term of court, the cause is reversed and remanded with directions to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in e^ror, Frank Wheeler, was convicted in the county court of Murray county at the March, 1910, term, on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful purpose of selling the same, and was thereafter sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of six months. The only proof in this record upon which the conviction is based is that the defendant had possession of certain intoxicating liquor. Following the rule laid down in the case of Brooks Andrews v. State, infra, decided at this term of court, the cause is reversed and remanded with directions to grant a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 508, 118 P. 1118, 6 Okla. Crim. 685, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.