Wheeler v. State

280 So. 2d 495, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7856
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheeler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 311 So. 2d 713
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1973·No. No. 72-1475·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant defendant seeks review of his convictions and sentences on the charges of unlawful sale and possession of a narcotic drug.

Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error regarding appellant’s convictions has been made to appear. However, we have noted, and the state has conceded an error in the sentencing of the appellant. See, Yost v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 469. Accordingly, the convictions are hereby affirmed, but the sentences are vacated, and this cause is remanded with directions that the appellant defendant is presented to the trial court and properly sentenced in accord herewith.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. State, 280 So. 2d 495, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7856 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

280 So. 2d 495 (Wheeler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yost v. State
243 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)