Wheeler v. Salinger
This text of 125 S.E. 888 (Wheeler v. Salinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.) After verdict for the plaintiff for principal, interest, and attorney’s fees as sued for, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted. The facts, in addition to those contained in the statement above, are sufficiently indicated in the headnotes. It is not deemed necessary to elaborate any of the rulings therein made.
Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 888, 33 Ga. App. 300, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-salinger-gactapp-1924.