Wheeler v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wheeler v. Roberts

101 A.D.2d 714, 475 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting the motion of defendant Northern Oswego County Health Services, Inc., for summary judgment. A cross claim for apportionment of fault necessarily depends upon the proof adduced at trial and the basis of plaintiff’s recovery, if any, against it. At this stage of the proceedings, the motion is premature (Oswald v Reimann & Georger, 101 AD2d 693). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting the motion of defendant Northern Oswego County Health Services, Inc., for summary judgment. A cross claim for apportionment of fault necessarily depends upon the proof adduced at trial and the basis of plaintiff’s recovery, if any, against it. At this stage of the proceedings, the motion is premature (Oswald v Reimann & Georger, 101 AD2d 693). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Wheeler v. Roberts, 101 A.D.2d 714, 475 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

101 A.D.2d 714 (Wheeler v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related