Wheeler v. Roberts

101 A.D.2d 714, 475 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 714 (Wheeler v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler v. Roberts, 101 A.D.2d 714, 475 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting the motion of defendant Northern Oswego County Health Services, Inc., for summary judgment. A cross claim for apportionment of fault necessarily depends upon the proof adduced at trial and the basis of plaintiff’s recovery, if any, against it. At this stage of the proceedings, the motion is premature (Oswald v Reimann & Georger, 101 AD2d 693). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haseley Trucking Co. v. Great Lakes Pipe Co.
101 A.D.2d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 714, 475 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-roberts-nyappdiv-1984.