Wheeler v. Remedial Loan Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Wheeler v. Remedial Loan Co.

67 Pa. Super. 21, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 331

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 310

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Pa. Super. 21 (Wheeler v. Remedial Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Remedial Loan Co., 67 Pa. Super. 21, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 331 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Williams, J.,

This was an action to recover interest, charged by defendant, in excess of six per cent, per annum on a loan of $100. Defendant was licensed as a money-lender under the provisions of the Act of June 19, 1915, P. L. 1012. The issue presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of the act. So far as that question is concerned no new issues are presented differentiating this from Com. v. Puder, 67 Pa. Superior Ct. 11. For the reasons there assigned the judgment is affirmed.

Orlady, P. J., and Henderson, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Williams, J.,

This was an action to recover interest, charged by defendant, in excess of six per cent, per annum on a loan of $100. Defendant was licensed as a money-lender under the provisions of the Act of June 19, 1915, P. L. 1012. The issue presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of the act. So far as that question is concerned no new issues are presented differentiating this from Com. v. Puder, 67 Pa. Superior Ct. 11. For the reasons there assigned the judgment is affirmed.

Orlady, P. J., and Henderson, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Pa. Super. 21, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-remedial-loan-co-pasuperct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack