Wheeler v. Preston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wheeler v. Preston

55 N.Y.S. 1151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 55 N.Y.S. 1151 (Wheeler v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Preston, 55 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Order reversed, except as to Gertrude E. Lee, and the motion granted upon the following conditions: That the premises in question shall be resold by the same referee upon the usual notice, and that the plaintiff shall stipulate to bid upon such resale the same sum at which the premises were sold upon a former sale, and pay all the costs and expenses of such resale, together with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, and $10 costs of the motion. It is further ordered that the plaintiff have leave to amend his complaint by demanding judgment for deficiency against the executors of Charles C. Good, deceased, and that the said executors and the defendant Preston have leave to answer said amended complaint, and that as to the defendant Gertrude E. Lee the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Order reversed, except as to Gertrude E. Lee, and the motion granted upon the following conditions: That the premises in question shall be resold by the same referee upon the usual notice, and that the plaintiff shall stipulate to bid upon such resale the same sum at which the premises were sold upon a former sale, and pay all the costs and expenses of such resale, together with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, and $10 costs of the motion. It is further ordered that the plaintiff have leave to amend his complaint by demanding judgment for deficiency against the executors of Charles C. Good, deceased, and that the said executors and the defendant Preston have leave to answer said amended complaint, and that as to the defendant Gertrude E. Lee the order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-preston-nyappdiv-1898.