Wheeler v. Nims

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 15, 1922
DocketNo. 971
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 (Wheeler v. Nims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler v. Nims, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 (Ohio Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

ALLREAD, J.

Epitomized Case

Defendant Nims was the holder of a duly executed 99-year lease of Columbus property and the Kibler Co., a defendant, held a duly recorded prior 10-year defectively executed lease of part of the same premises of which Nims had actual notice at the time he negotiated for and obtained his lease. There was a recital in the 99-year lease, referring to the Kibler lease. The Appellate Court held:

1. The affirmation and recognition of the defective lease of the Kibler Co. by the lessee in the 99-year lease had the effect of validating it and estopping both parties from denying its validity.

2. The lessor was under a moral obligation to protect the Kibler lease in any subsequent conveyance, and this obligation to protect and make good the lease is recognized as such in a court of equity- This they attempted to do by inserting a validating recital in the 99-year lease, and a court of chancery should recognize the validity of the prior defective lease and afford as full relief against the 99-year lease as it would originally have exercised against the lessors.

Decree in favor of the Kibler Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mossgrove v. All States Oil & Producing Co.
265 N.E.2d 299 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-nims-ohioctapp-1922.