Wheeler v. Montgomery

Supreme Court

Wheeler v. Montgomery

394 U.S. 970, 89 S. Ct. 1452, 22 L. Ed. 2d 751, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1888

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 21, 1969

DocketNo. 634

StatusPublished

This text of 394 U.S. 970 (Wheeler v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Montgomery, 394 U.S. 970, 89 S. Ct. 1452, 22 L. Ed. 2d 751, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1888 (1969).

Pincite

Opinion

[970]*970Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Probable jurisdiction noted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Richard L. Mayers and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Attorneys General, and Thomas M. O’Connor for appellees. Martin Garbus for Roger Baldwin Foundation of the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[970]*970Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Probable jurisdiction noted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Richard L. Mayers and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Attorneys General, and Thomas M. O’Connor for appellees. Martin Garbus for Roger Baldwin Foundation of the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae in support of the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 U.S. 970, 89 S. Ct. 1452, 22 L. Ed. 2d 751, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-montgomery-scotus-1969.