Wheeler v. McCorristen
24 Ill. 42
Opinion
There was no execution set up in this case as a justification for taking the property. The jury weighed the evidence as to plaintiff’s right to the property, and if they believed the witness, they could find as they did.
There is nothing in the action of the court on the instructions, to justify our interference. The case of Wheeler v. McCorristen, ante, decides this case.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wheeler v. McCorristen, 24 Ill. 42 (Ill. 1860).
24 Ill. 42 (Wheeler v. McCorristen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lang v. Metzger
101 Ill. App. 380 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)
Mount Carbon Coal & Railroad v. Andrews
53 Ill. 176 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
Rust v. Mansfield
25 Ill. 336 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1861)