Wheeler v. Marshals Police Department gov

Opinion

3) ANTONIO WHEELER, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00788-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Setting Deadline for 5} v. Amended Complaint MARSHALS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et [ECF No. 16] , al., Defendants 8 9 On January 31, 2025, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that plaintiff Antonio Wheeler’s complaint be dismissed with leave to amend by March 3, 2025. ECF No. 16. Wheeler did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16]| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 16) is accepted, and plaintiff Antonio Wheeler’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice. 20 I FURTHER ORDER that the deadline for plaintiff Antonio Wheeler to file an amended 21)/complaint is March 3, 2025. 22 DATED this 20th day of February, 2025. Z 23 ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE