Wheeler v. Lynch
42 So. 538, 89 Miss. 157
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We think the demurrer to the original bill should have been overruled. See the cases cited ,in the brief of counsel. If this were not true, it is still true that the demurrer to the amended declaration should have been overruled. Ann. Code 1892, § 3776; Dodds v. Marx, 63 Miss., 445.
Reversed and remanded, with thirty days to appellee to ansiuer the bill after mandate filed below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wheeler v. Lynch, 42 So. 538, 89 Miss. 157 (Mich. 1906).
42 So. 538 (Wheeler v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jefferson v. Walker
24 So. 2d 343 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
Woods v. Linder
11 So. 2d 900 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Brown v. Womack
178 So. 785 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Carr v. Barton
162 So. 172 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Albritton v. Fairley
77 So. 651 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)