Wheeler v. Lorenz

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheeler v. Lorenz. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ohio App. 218
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 1926·No. No. 1582·Published

Opinion

RICHARDS, J.

This is a proceeding in error arising out of the action of the Lucas Common Pleas in setting aside a sale of real estate made by the sheriff on execution.

The purchaser bought the property under the misapprehension that he could apply a mortgage which he held on the property in payment of the purchase price.

Only two questions are involved in this case. First, was the order setting aside the sale a final order to which error may be prosecuted? Second, was the court guilty of an abuse of discretion in setting aside the sale? The Court of Appeals held:

1. An order setting aside a sheriff’s sale made on execution is a final order from which a proceeding in error may be prosecuted.
2. Contention that purchaser’s misapprehension was a mistake of law and not a mistake of fact, and therefore setting aside the sale was an abuse of discretion, is not in accord with the authorities on this point.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Lorenz, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 253 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 253 (Wheeler v. Lorenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.