Wheeler v. Lappin

333 F. App'x 746
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2009·No. No. 09-7121·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quinton Wheeler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, denying his motion for preliminary injunction, and denying his motion to supplement his claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[747] sons stated by the district court. Wheeler v. Lappin, No. 1:08-cv-00206-IMK-JSK, 2009 WL 1587192 (N.D.W. Va. June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Lappin, 333 F. App'x 746 (4th Cir. 2009).

333 F. App'x 746 (Wheeler v. Lappin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related