Wheeler v. Johnson

97 Mass. 39
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Foster, J.

The maker of a note payable to bearer cannot defeat an action thereon brought in the name of one who had possession of the note at the commencement of the suit and has continued to hold it ever since, by showing that a third party was the real owner of the note, when it appears that such third party has never objected to the possession of the plaintiff and the suit brought by him, but has expressly consented to and ratified such possession and the prosecution of the action. Beekman v. Wilson, 9 Met. 436.

The application of this principle to the facts of the present case shows that the exceptions must be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Johnson, 97 Mass. 39 (Mass. 1867).

97 Mass. 39 (Wheeler v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jump v. Leon
78 N.E. 532 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Parks v. Smith
28 N.E. 1044 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Smith v. Lawson
18 W. Va. 212 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
Spofford v. Norton
126 Mass. 533 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)