Wheeler v. Johnson

203 F. App'x 520
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2006·No. No. 06-6228·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rowland A. Wheeler, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to deny his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Johnson, 203 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2006).

203 F. App'x 520 (Wheeler v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)