Wheeler v. Hampson

California Supreme Court

Wheeler v. Hampson

16 Cal. 291, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 222

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cal. 291 (Wheeler v. Hampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Hampson, 16 Cal. 291, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 222 (Cal. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This case involves the same principles as that of Hart v. Burnett, recently decided. The argument of respondent is addressed mainly to show that the title held by the city is not such as to exempt it from execution sale. This question was considered at great length in the case of Hart v. Burnett, and it is not considered necessary to go over the subject again. We are satisfied with the decision in that case, and reaffirm it now.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This case involves the same principles as that of Hart v. Burnett, recently decided. The argument of respondent is addressed mainly to show that the title held by the city is not such as to exempt it from execution sale. This question was considered at great length in the case of Hart v. Burnett, and it is not considered necessary to go over the subject again. We are satisfied with the decision in that case, and reaffirm it now.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Cal. 291, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-hampson-cal-1860.