Wheeler v. Gass

Supreme Court of Georgia

Wheeler v. Gass

81 S.E. 866, 141 Ga. 559, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 50

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 23, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Eish, C. J.

There was no copiplaint that any error of law was committed on the trial. There was evidence to authorize the verdict. The witness making the affidavit as to the alleged newly discovered evidence made a second affidavit wherein the material statements made in the first were repudiated. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur, except Atkinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eish, C. J.

There was no copiplaint that any error of law was committed on the trial. There was evidence to authorize the verdict. The witness making the affidavit as to the alleged newly discovered evidence made a second affidavit wherein the material statements made in the first were repudiated. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur, except Atkinson, J., absent.

Wheeler v. Gass, 81 S.E. 866, 141 Ga. 559, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 50 (Ga. 1914).

Pincite

81 S.E. 866 (Wheeler v. Gass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related